Transporter Woes at South Africa’s Borders

Hits smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A survey of 37 transport company managers and executives in 2009 revealed interesting patterns of dissatisfaction with the performance of South African border posts.

The respondents commented only on the borders used by their fleets and the survey was limited to the border posts on Botswana border (Skilpadshek-Pioneers Gate; Kopfontein-Tlokweng and Groblersbrug-Martins Drift) , Zimbabwe border (Beit Bridge), Mozambique border (Lebombo-Ressano-Garcia), Lesotho border, (Maseru Bridge) and Swaziland border (Oshoek- Ngwenya). The comments related to the South African side of each border.

The managers were asked to describe the major issues that contribute to increased costs and delays and their responses were categorised into nine specific areas of concern or comment.

The proportion of comments regarding each aspect of performance at the seven border posts is shown in the graph below.

As shown in the table below, the three main concerns centred on SARS with 20.4% of respondents responding negatively about staff attitudes, 14.0% reported delays due to insufficient SARS staff for the traffic volumes and 15.1 % reported the prevalence of corruption and bribery.

graph

21.5% of respondents said that infrastructure and parking was a serious problem at most of the border posts as the trade volumes have outgrown the facilities and the capacity of the authorities to process the volumes of freight vehicles.

Transporter Comments

Categories

Transporter

Comments as a %

No Problems 2.2%
SARS Attitude 20.4%
Operating Times 3.2%
Congestion/Queues 10.8%
No Parking 21.5%
Buses/Taxis/Private 8.6%
SARS Staff Shortages 14.0%
Operating Times 4.3%
Corruption/Bribery 15.0%

An interesting corroboration of the assessment of the managers and executives was provided by the similar survey that questioned 63 truck drivers at random at the various border posts.

The drivers tended to combine all problems with officials into several negative comments about SARS that recurred in 50,8% of responses. A further 23.8% of drivers complained about lack of infrastructure, congestion, lack of signage, and parking space.

Truck Driver Comments

Problems Percentage
No Problems 20.2%
SARS 50.8%
Congestion/Queues 1.6%
Operating Times 23.8%
System Changes 1.6%
The information from the survey reiterates the many negative comments made in reports on the inefficiency of South African border posts, and the frustrations of the transporters using them.

(File material from Southern African Freight Transport Institute – July 2010)

Add this page to Blinklist Add this page to Del.icoi.us Add this page to Digg Add this page to Facebook Add this page to Furl Add this page to Google Add this page to Ma.Gnolia Add this page to Newsvine Add this page to Reddit Add this page to StumbleUpon Add this page to Technorati Add this page to Yahoo